By
commanding the humankind to increase and multiply in Genesis, God was invariably endorsing the union of man and woman
for the begetting of children. One curious observation is that the rest of the
living creatures God had made were also imbued with reproductive capacity,
plants and animals alike; they even know greater increase than the humankind
can even stand. Given this fact, what novelty is there in the great injunction
of multiplicity and increase to humans in the creative order? The answer is a
simple one: the mandate of dominion, one that entrusted the care of creation to
the human species. Therefore, it was God’s plan from the onset to have the
humankind steer the course of the great ship of created order to God’s end. God, however, remained the guiding star
to which humankind, the sailor, should fix their gaze if home, God’s end, is
their desired goal.
Given
the great injunction of procreation, and the accompanying mandate of dominion,
there comes with them the need for suitable institutions with which both the
injunction and the mandate could see the light of day. Suffice it therefore to
say that the minimum requirement for meeting the demand of Genesis on the humankind is the organization of the human society
in such a way that those ends be met. And there are two basic facts that are
revealing of the indispensability of this organization. Firstly, humans don’t
live forever; our span is 70 and 80 for those who are strong (cfr Ps. 90:10).
And this immediately calls to mind the all-important need for continuity if
perpetuity is ever to be in sight. Secondly, the human young become what we
make them as, intellectus
in principio est sicut tabula rasa – the
intellect is a blank slate at birth. And so the human young grows to assume the
shape of his or her nurture-mould.
Hence the institution called marriage, and the ensuing fact of the family.
Imagine
the human race without the reality of marriage, which legitimizes the pairing
of seemingly compatible and consenting mature males and females (not minding
the current waves of gay marriage) for the purpose of mutual complementarity
and procreation. And in the process the formation of the family, which is a
platform for the initiation of the children that would come to society through
their passage into functional and meaningful social life and the ensuring that
they are imbued with requisite capabilities for independent existence with a
view to continuous re-inventing the wheel of marriage and family.
And
so, the great injunction of procreation and the standing mandate of dominion
have been held sacrosanct by successive generations of the humankind, spanning
from Adam to your parents – and you. The big question in this regard is: How
has this succession been possible? The fourth commandment of the Decalogue,
honour thy parents, has the answer.
Why
honour thy parents? Four children attempting to answer this question could give
as many as four different answers. One may simply say it’s because they gave
birth to them. The second may say it’s because they are their providers –
shelter, clothing, health, feeding, education, toys, etc. The third may
probably say it’s because they are elderly and deserving of honour. And the
fourth may simply say it’s because they wield the rod and wouldn’t spoil them
by sparing it. Inasmuch as we cannot rightly say that any of them is more right
than others, looking beyond the temporal to God’s divine plan and purpose would
afford a richer understanding. And remember that it was God who commanded it in
the first place – to the glory of his name and the betterment of human kind.
Therefore,
the more appropriate reason why the honour of parents is imperative is so as to
maintain and sustain the already established institution of family, within
which children, under the guidance of their parents, acquire the requisite
skills to function and sustain their place in the scheme of things. But this is
not the same with plants and animals, although it tends to seem the case in the
classes closer to the human species – but never the same!
The
imperative to honor parents ensures the teacher-student and guidance-guided
ideals that ought to exist in the parent-child relationship, without which on
the attainment of primary reason the
child might begin to arrogate to him/herself that which he/she cannot afford or
sustain at the long –run. For instance, when a 14-year-old girl-child begins to
arrogate the care of her sexuality to herself while just in JSS3, what becomes
of her when her emotions fails her – as it usually does – and some crazy guy
out there takes advantage of her, leaving her pregnant in the process? Who
cleans up the mess? Who restores her back to order? Who makes her understand
that what happened to her is one of those things that happen to self-willed
teenagers? On whose shoulders would she lean on while rolling out all the tears
she could afford on pondering the disgrace she has won for herself? But with
the injunction of parental honor, the whole event would rarely have occurred
should she has lent her ears to her parents’ instructions on how to carry on with
her daily activities mindful of her sexuality.
It
is very important to underscoring here that the conventional rendition of the
fourth commandment of the Decalogue as simply parental obedience is grossly
reductive. Obedience is only a component of honour. What do you then do with
them when you outgrow their obedience – in the sense that they realize you have
become your own man and no longer obligate you to do anything? At that point,
have your parents outlived their usefulness? No. The word ‘honour’ is fatter
than mere obedience; it is ‘great respect or esteem.’ This understanding will
further obligate you to be all there for them in the latter days of their life
when they start folding up for the great beyond; you help them ‘fold up’ for the
hereafter as they helped you ‘open up’ for the here and now. It equally
obligates you to treat even the mere memory of them with love, constantly
blessing the womb that bore you, the breast that suckled you and the hands that
provided for you.
Further,
it is worth pointing out that the restriction of the concept of ‘parent’ to one’s
father and mother is inappropriate. Christ holds a better teaching here – for
he came to fulfill the law. On being asked who a neighbor was Jesus begins to
render the well-known parable of the Good Samaritan. You would have expected
him to tell you about the person next door, you seatmate in the commuter bus, your
classmate, your church brethren, but he told the story of enmity, and enjoins
his questioner to go and do the same. Who are your parents? Anyone who is
capable of instructing you in the path of right, with a view to equipping you
to respond appropriately to the great injunction and mandate of Genesis is your parent. Get used to it.
Now,
spend some time thinking about why the fourth commandment of the Decalogue is
the only one of them with a promise – longevity. And so I advice you, Honour
thy parents and live!

No comments:
Post a Comment